Preventing conflict · APH inquiry · 2026 · insight-bridge

First Resort

The 150 public submissions, supplementaries, attachments and hearing transcripts that 88 submitters put to the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade's inquiry into the role of Australia's international development program in preventing conflict, read as one record.

Open Galaxy Map
88
submitters read end-to-end
43 gave evidence at a hearing
150
documents
86 submissions · 11 supplementary submissions · 7 attachments · 46 hearing extracts
1,789
passages embedded
7
topic clusters
1 junk removed after review
264
submitter-level stances
by 74 submitters
32
sector perspectives

How the record is organised

The pipeline read the 88 submitters into 7 topics, each a proposition the submissions argue about. Every name below is the pipeline's; click a topic to open it.

Prevention Funding: Combine Patient Support With RapidResponse · 86 submittersConflict Safeguards: Assess Aid And Investment ThroughoutDelivery · 85 submittersPrevention Mandate: Avoid Blanket Objectives Across AidPrograms · 84 submittersConflict Prevention: Address Grievances Through InclusiveDevelopment · 82 submittersPrevention Programming: Target Dedicated Efforts WhereAustralia Contributes · 80 submittersAid Allocation: Rebalance Institutions And ImmediateViolence Responses · 33 submittersLocal Leadership: Fund Community And Women-Led Recovery · 32 submitters88 submitters7 topicstopics · submitters in each
  1. 88 submitters · 7 topics

Read the topics → — every topic with its claim, its figures and its reading; every topic and submitter opens the record.

Who submitted — submitters by sector
Civil Society
48
Individual
15
Government
10
Academia
9
Company
3
Industry Group
2
Unclassified
1

The pipeline's classification of each submitter. 5 submitters were placed in two sectors; the organisation's sector is treated as primary.

The widest-reaching cluster

86 submitters engage it, 61 with a written stance across 7 sectors. 93.4% supportive of its framing.

Every topic by reach →