First Resort
The 150 public submissions, supplementaries, attachments and hearing transcripts that 88 submitters put to the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade's inquiry into the role of Australia's international development program in preventing conflict, read as one record.
Open Galaxy MapHow the record is organised
The pipeline read the 88 submitters into 7 topics, each a proposition the submissions argue about. Every name below is the pipeline's; click a topic to open it.
- 88 submitters · 7 topics
Read the topics → — every topic with its claim, its figures and its reading; every topic and submitter opens the record.
Submitter-level stances written for exemplar and high-value memberships, by the sector of the submitter. Counts describe who wrote to the inquiry, never prevalence.
87.5% of the 264 stances support or build on the framing they address; 14 redirect or oppose it. Dissent surfaces in the Supports-versus-Builds-on split, in sector divergence inside a cluster, and in who is absent from it.
The pipeline's classification of each submitter. 5 submitters were placed in two sectors; the organisation's sector is treated as primary.
86 submitters engage it, 61 with a written stance across 7 sectors. 93.4% supportive of its framing.
Describe a question in your own words; the clusters closest to it come from a semantic search over 1,789 passages.
Every submitter, filterable by sector, by whether they gave evidence and by what they lodged, with a live drawer of what the pipeline found in each document.
The pipeline, this run's profile, how to read a position, and the run's scale in live figures.
The same data over a Model Context Protocol server: add it as a connector and an agent can search the passages, split any cluster by sector, and read every submitter's stance.